USPTO serial 76209599
TERRACE PATTERNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TERRACE PATTERNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter A Rodgers
WALTER A RODGERS RODGERS & RODGERS880 N ISLAND DR NWATLANTA, GA 30327-4662UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL PLANT STANDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named TERRACE PATTERNS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |