USPTO serial 76209610
HANDI-HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANDI-HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Eisen
MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO20 QUEEN ST W STE 3202 BOX 10TORONTO, ON M5H 3R3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Lawn and garden tools, and leisure products for lawn and garden, namely, metal ladders | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Lawn and garden tools, and leisure products for lawn and garden, namely, garage organizers comprised of shelves and storage racks, and non-metal ladders | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Lawn and garden tools, and leisure products for lawn and garden, namely, garbage bag holders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |