USPTO serial 76209626
ABRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya L. Curtis
TANYA L CURTIS KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS525 W MONROE, STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60661-3693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | billing services, namely, billing services provided for medical practitioners and hospital emergency departments | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, money management services, financial investment in the fields of securities, commodities, and financial instruments, brokerage services in the nature of facilitating lending relationships for mortgages and commercial loans, and insurance agency services in the fields of life, health, malpractice, directors and officers errors and omissions and property casualty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |