USPTO serial 76209965
HOW BAD HAVE YOU GOT IT?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2948494Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOW BAD HAVE YOU GOT IT??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
Daytona Beach, FL
Other trademarks owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
Daytona Beach, FL
Other trademarks owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
Daytona Beach, FL
Other trademarks owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pens and pencils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HOW BAD HAVE YOU GOT IT?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 18, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 18, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |