Drawing for HOW BAD HAVE YOU GOT IT?

USPTO serial 76209966

HOW BAD HAVE YOU GOT IT?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOW BAD HAVE YOU GOT IT??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ginabeth B Hutchison

GINABETH B HUTCHISON ALSTON & BIRD LLPONE ATLANTIC CTR1201 W PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309-3424

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games, playthings, and sporting goods, namely, basketball backboards, toy and non-motorized scooters; skateboards and skateboard bags; bendable play figures; toy action figures and accessories therefor; sports board games; balls, namely, basketballs, playground balls; sport balls; foam action balls; and toy hoop sets; toy banks; toy watches; bath tub toys, namely, sponge toys, squirt toys, jitter toys, and toys designed to adhere to the wall of the tub enclosure when wet; children's multiple activity toys; toy magic tricks; water squirting toys, wind up toys; jump ropes; sling shots; audio and visual toys, namely, talking dolls, toy 3-D viewers and reels; action skill games; board games; card games; hand held units for playing electronic games; stand alone video game machines and programs therefore sold as a unit; electronic game equipment with a watch function; hand-held LCD game machines; coin and non-coin operated game tables; pinball machines and pinball type games; jigsaw puzzles; and manipulative puzzlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance