USPTO serial 76210011
SOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
00020 Merita, FI
HELSINKI, FI
HELSINKI, FI
HELSINKI, FI
HELSINKI, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated teller machines; automatic bank note dispensers, namely, automatic paper money sorting machines; bank cards incorporating data carriers; magnetically encoded debit cards; magnetic encoded card readers for credit cards; computer terminals for use with credit cards and debit cards; magnetically encoded credit cards for electronic funds transfer and financial transactions; apparatus for payment with magnetic memory cards, namely, computer terminals; apparatus for receiving, cash payments, namely, automatic teller machines; automatic payment machines, namely, automated banking machines; electronic identification cards for use in paying for services; machine readable devices, consisting of diskettes, magnetic tapes and bar code carriers for cashless payment systems; magnetic and encoded payment cards; payment cards incorporating data carriers; equipment for telecommunication and interactive communication, namely, computers, telephones, radios and televisions; computer communications software to allow customers to access bank account information and transact banking business; computer e-commerce software for verifying and facilitating on-line retail sales and business to business transactions; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network excluding personal computers and personal computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERITA BANK PLC
- Other trademarks owned by NCF BANK PLC
- Other trademarks owned by NORDEA BANK FINLAND ABP
- Other trademarks owned by NORDEA BANK FINLAND ABP
- Other trademarks owned by NORDEA BANK FINLAND PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SOLO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 24, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |