Drawing for JUSTIN CREDIBLE

USPTO serial 76210019

JUSTIN CREDIBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARNER, CHRISTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUSTIN CREDIBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BELLA I. KARAKIS

BELLA I KARAKIS LEGAL AFFAIRS DEPT OF WORLD ET AL1241 E MAIN STSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOY ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; CARRYING CASES FOR TOY ACTION FIGURES; BENDABLE TOYS; TOY VEHICLES; TOY MINIATURE DOLLS; BOARD GAMES; TOY SPINNING TOPS; ARCADE GAMES RELATED TO WRESTLING; COIN-OPERATED AND NON-COIN OPERATED PINBALL GAMES AND PINBALL MACHINES RELATED TO WRESTLING; HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; TABLETOP ACTION SKILL GAMES RELATED TO WRESTLING; JIGSAW PUZZLES; KITES; TOY WRESTLING RINGS; DOLLS; PUPPETS; STUFFED TOY ANIMALS; AERODYNAMIC FLYING DISCS FOR USE IN PLAYING CATCHING GAMES; CARD GAMES; BEAN BAG STUFFED TOY BEARS; ELECTRONIC TOY GUITARS; TOY WATER GUNS; VINYL POOL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PILLOW BACK FLOATING RECREATIONAL LOUNGE CHAIRS, ONE AND TWO-MAN INFLATABLE RIDE-ON TOY BOATS, AND INFLATABLE INNER TUBES FOR AQUATIC RECREATIONAL USE; TOY ROCKETS; CASES FOR TOY VEHICLES; ACTION FIGURE CLOTHING; COLLECTIBLE TOY FIGURES; COSTUME MASKS; DOLL FURNITURE; PORCELAIN DOLLS; FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS; PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF CRACKERS AND NOISEMAKERS; SKATEBOARDS; BOWLING BALLS; WIND-UP TOYS; TOY SCOOTERS; BOWLING PINS; KNEE AND ELBOW PADS FOR ATHLETIC USE; YO-YOS WITH LIGHTS AND SOUNDS; REMOTE CONTROLLED TOY ROBOTS; INFLATABLE SWIMMING POOLS FOR USE AS PLAY ARTICLES; BOWLING ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, WRIST BANDS, BOWLING GLOVES, WRIST SUPPORTS, AND BOWLING BALL BAGS; POOL CUES; CHRISTMAS STOCKINGS; TIN CARRYING CASES FOR PLAY AND TOY ACCESSORIES; TOY TIN BANKS; TOY GUMBALL MACHINES; MECHANICAL TOY CANDY BOWL DISPENSERS; TOY STICK GUM DISPENSERS; TOY MOLDS FOR MAKING FIGURES OUT OF GUM; ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS; AND ARCADE GAMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance