Drawing for FLEXANSWER

USPTO serial 76210074

FLEXANSWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLEXANSWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1300NEW YORK, NY 10036-8102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, computer programmes, computer, apparatus and instruments, all for use in receiving, transmitting, processing, storage, retrieval and reproduction of data; programmed data carrying computer software, supplied online from a database or from facilities provided via a global computer network including web-sites featuring natural language technologyACTIVE—
035Advertising, marketing, publicity and business services; business management; business administration; office functions; distribution of samples; management of computer files; publicity and commercial transactions concerning question and answering servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunications; transmission, reception and communication of electronic mail services and data, supplied on-line via a global computer network including web-sites; information and consultancy services relating to the above mentioned servicesACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer and data programs; advisory, research and consultancy services provided via a global computer network including web-sites; tailoring customer service and management suites to support, maintain and monitor the information provided allowing a company to supply a web-based question and answering service on their products and goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance