USPTO serial 76210080
IKARAOKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2006
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IKARAOKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned T. Himmelrich
Ned T. Himmelrich GORDON FEINBLATT LLC233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3332UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, namely, computer programs and downloadable computer programs for assisting in the playing and recording the images and sounds of, musical instruments, instruments and voices; audio and video equipment, namely, [ audio tape, ] compact disc and [ digital music ] recorders, [ video tape recorders, amplifiers, players, audio speakers and microphones; ] musical sound recordings, blank audio [ and video cassette and discs ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 2001 |
| 035 | [ On-line retail store services, retail distributorship services, and mail-order catalog services, featuring computer hardware and software, audio equipment and software, and video equipment and software, musical sound recordings, blank audio and video cassettes and discs, amplifiers, speakers, microphones, and books ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |