USPTO serial 76210144
MILLENNIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY C. DICONZA
NANCY C DICONZA FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | prescription pharmaceutical preparations for use in the diagnosis or treatment of human diseases and disorders, namely, circulatory, respiratory, endocrine, neurologic, alimentary, pulmonary, musculoskeletal, lymphatic, gastrointestinal, bone sensory, viral urinary, renal, infectious, metabolic or central nervous system diseases and disorders; excluding analgesics; diagnostic assays and test kits for clinical, laboratory, medical and chemical use to diagnose, prognose, predict or treat diseases and for providing genomic and proteomic profiles useful in the selection of therapeutics; assays and test kits for evaluating efficacy of treatments and treatment progress; prognostic test kits for identifying hereditary risk factors; diagnostic preparations, namely, preparations of extracts, assays, nucleic acids, proteins, polypeptides, and antibodies, and molecular arrays of biological materials for clinical or medical laboratory use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |