USPTO serial 76210294
MARRAKESH EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARRAKESH EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY E.CARROLL
AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPSTE 1100 1500 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |