USPTO serial 76210324
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ATLANTA, GA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Greg J. Kirsch
Greg J. Kirsch Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP999 Peachtree StreetSuite 1000Atlanta, GA 30309| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information in the field of automated marketing campaigns that combine online strategies and tactics and analysis thereof; business consulting and business marketing consultation; data processing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1999 |
| 041 | Providing educational services in the nature of classes, seminars, workshops and individual tutoring, presented in person and through electronic communications means, dealing with marketing for businesses and marketing automation; computer education training; arranging and conducting educational conferences and demonstrations; and distribution of educational course material in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer consultation; computer systems analysis; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network, local area networks and wide area networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |