USPTO serial 76210444
MOSTLY MAKE-UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOSTLY MAKE-UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN4143 N 27TH STARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS, MOISTURIZERS, AND POWDERS FOR THE FACE, BODY AND HANDS; LIPSTICK AND LIP GLOSS; EYESHADOW; EYE PENCILS, MASCARAS; FOUNDATION MAKE UP; BALANCING MAKE UP AND TONERS; BLUSH; MAKE-UP REMOVER; MOIST AND DRY ROUGE; UNDER EYE CONCEALERS; EYELASH MAKE-UP; PERFUME; EAU DE TOILETTE; BATH AND SHOWER GEL AND SALTS; BEAUTY SOAPS; BODY DEODORANTS; NAIL POLISH; GEL FOAMS, BALMS IN AEROSOL FORM FOR THE HAIR, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS; HAIR SPRAYS, HAIR COLORINGS, HAIR-BLEACHING PREPARATIONS; HAIR WAVING LOTIONS; SHAVING CREAMS; AND TANNING AND AFTER-SUN SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, SCARVES, AND APRONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |