Drawing for BIP BEST INTERNET PAYMENTS

USPTO serial 76210480

BIP BEST INTERNET PAYMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIP BEST INTERNET PAYMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura E. Goldbard

LAURA E GOLDBARD STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038-4982UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer program for transmission, processing, management and analysis of financial dataABANDONED—
036banking services offered on-line via a global computer network, monetary exchange services offered on-line via a global computer networkABANDONED—
038Electronic transmission of financial data and documents via computer terminal; rental of message transmission equipment, electronic message and image transmission with the aid of a computerABANDONED—
042Computer consultation in the field of software developmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance