Drawing for SND SMART NETWORK DEVICES

USPTO serial 76210501

SND SMART NETWORK DEVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SND SMART NETWORK DEVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEWART J. BELLUS

STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CALCULATORS, COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE; OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR USE ON A SINGLE-BOARD COMPUTER; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, NAMELY, COMPILERS, DEBUGGERS AND MONITORING TOOLS FOR SOFTWAREPROTOCOLL TRACING; BROWSER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE EMBEDDED IN SINGLE-BOARD COMPUTERS; SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF A NETWORK OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, NAMELY, COMPILERS, DEBUGGERS, MONITORING TOOLS FOR SOFTWAREPROTOCOLL TRACING, A HARDWARE MODULE, A CARRIER BOARD FOR THE HARDWARE MODULE AND CONNECTION CABLES; HARDWARE MODULES, NAMELY, SINGLE-BOARD COMPUTERS WITH PROCESSOR, WORKING MEMORY, PROGRAM MEMORY AND A NETWORK INTERFACEACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 22, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance