USPTO serial 76210501
SND SMART NETWORK DEVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SND SMART NETWORK DEVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CALCULATORS, COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE; OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR USE ON A SINGLE-BOARD COMPUTER; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, NAMELY, COMPILERS, DEBUGGERS AND MONITORING TOOLS FOR SOFTWAREPROTOCOLL TRACING; BROWSER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE EMBEDDED IN SINGLE-BOARD COMPUTERS; SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF A NETWORK OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, NAMELY, COMPILERS, DEBUGGERS, MONITORING TOOLS FOR SOFTWAREPROTOCOLL TRACING, A HARDWARE MODULE, A CARRIER BOARD FOR THE HARDWARE MODULE AND CONNECTION CABLES; HARDWARE MODULES, NAMELY, SINGLE-BOARD COMPUTERS WITH PROCESSOR, WORKING MEMORY, PROGRAM MEMORY AND A NETWORK INTERFACE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |