USPTO serial 76210577
TECATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay S Kopelowitz
JAY S KOPELOWITZ KOPELOWITZ & ASSOCIATESPACIFIC BELL BLDG 101 W BROADWAY STE1950SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-8220Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer network address management services; namely, providing services enabling entities to reserve and secure computer network addresses and to access, add, modify or delete information relating to their computer network addresses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |