USPTO serial 76210588
ECO CLAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3071316Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECO CLAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHAGRIN FALLS, OH
Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
Chagrin Falls, OH
Other trademarks owned by Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
Chagrin Falls, OH
Other trademarks owned by Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
Chagrin Falls, OH
Other trademarks owned by Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT M. OLDHAM
SCOTT M. OLDHAM HAHN LOESER & PARKS, LLPONE GOJO PLAZA, SUITE 300AKRON, OH 44311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Ecologically-friendly coatings which utilize biomimicry and probiotic means to manage corrosion and fouling in marine, brackish, freshwater, hydrophytic and closed water systems for use in ship hull coatings, structural coatings and specialty applications in water ways and hydrophytic environments in municipal and industrial settings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LURITEK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Natural Science Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named ECO CLAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |