USPTO serial 76210626
PREPARING A NEW GENERATION OF LEADERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREPARING A NEW GENERATION OF LEADERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATRINA RAINEY
KATRINA RAINEY KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MARKETING MATERIALS, EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS AND PAMPHLETS ALL COVERING A WIDE RANGE OF TOPICS; STATIONERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |