Drawing for PREPARING A NEW GENERATION OF LEADERS

USPTO serial 76210626

PREPARING A NEW GENERATION OF LEADERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREPARING A NEW GENERATION OF LEADERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATRINA RAINEY

KATRINA RAINEY KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MARKETING MATERIALS, EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS AND PAMPHLETS ALL COVERING A WIDE RANGE OF TOPICS; STATIONERYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 22, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 21, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 20, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 9, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance