USPTO serial 76210716
COLISEUM SPORTS BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLISEUM SPORTS BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cockeysville, MD
Cockeysville, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl E Eastwick
NED T HIMMERLRICH ESQ GORDAN, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN HOFBERGER & H233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3332UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant, night club, and bar services | ABANDONED | Sep 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |