USPTO serial 76211805
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Minato-ku, Tokyo 107, JP
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | METAL WORKING MACHINERY; CHEMICAL PROCESSING MACHINERY; SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY; PAINTING MACHINERY; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SEMICONDUCTOR TESTING EQUIPMENT; PROBE CARDS; PHYSIOCHEMICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; MEASURING DEVICES; POWER DISTRIBUTION AND/OR CONTROLLING INSTRUMENTS; OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; TELECOMMUNICATION MACHINES, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; ELECTRONIC MACHINES, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY, SEMICONDUCTOR TESTING MACHINERY AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY; RECORDED VIDEO DISCS AND TAPES; PLASMA ETCHING AND COATING EQUIPMENT; PHOTO-RESIST COATING EQUIPMENT; SPUTTERING EQUIPMENT; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPERS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS AND MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY; AND STATIONERY AND WRITING MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF INDUSTRIAL FURNACES, SEMICONDUCTOR TESTING EQUIPMENT, MEASURING DEVICES, SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY, AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY, AND CLEANING OF SEMICONDUCTOR TESTING EQUIPMENT, SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY, AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING ONLINE INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET IN THE FIELDS OF SEMICONDUCTORS, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES; PROVIDING TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND/OR DESIGN SERVICES AND/OR TESTING, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND/OR LEASING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY, SEMICONDUCTOR TESTING EQUIPMENT, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION MACHINERY; LEASING TIME TO AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASE; SYSTEMIZATION AND COMPILATION OF INFORMATION INTO COMPUTER DATA BASES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |