USPTO serial 76211809
NETWORKED VALUE CHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2002
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETWORKED VALUE CHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edmund J. Ferdinand, III
Edmund J. Ferdinand, III Jeffers Cowherd P.C.55 Walls DriveFairfield, CT 06824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of supply chain and inventory management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cap Gemini Ernst & Young U.S. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cap Gemini Ernst & Young U.S. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CAPGEMINI U.S. LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named NETWORKED VALUE CHAIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |