USPTO serial 76211934
NEUROSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUROSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEUROSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Burnaby, British Columbia V3B 1A8, CA
NEUROSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Burnaby, British Columbia V3B 1A8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce Haraguchi
BRUCE HARAGUCHI SEYFARTH SHAW LLP55 E MONROE STSTE 4300CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biomedical equipment for use in scientific applications, namely electrical leads, electrical power supplies, signal amplifiers, signal processing units, software for signal transmission, hardware for signal transmission, namely, radio frequency and infrared transmitters and receivers, computer software for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, hardware for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, namely, electronic amplifiers, rectifiers, bin integrators, impedance meters, and threshold detectors; and computer software for controlling the stimulation of nerves | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Biomedical devices, namely, nerve cuffs, control systems for regulating biological functions, namely, sensors, feedback amplifiers and electrical stimulators, hardware for fluid administration to nerves, namely, implanatable pumps, surgical tools for implanting nerve cuffs in associated biomedical devices; biomedical equipment for use in medical procedures, namely, electrical leads, electrical power supplies, signal amplifiers, signal processing units, software for signal transmission, hardware for signal transmission, namely, radio frequency and infrared transmitters and receivers, computer software for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, hardware for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, namely, electronic amplifiers, rectifiers, bin integrators, impedance meters, and threshold detectors; and computer software for controlling the stimulation of nerves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEUROSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEUROSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named NEUROSTREAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |