USPTO serial 76211974
ROCKWELL COLLINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2004
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ROCKWELL COLLINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MILWAUKEE, WI
MILWAUKEE, WI
Rockwell International Corporation
Milwaukee, WI
Other trademarks owned by Rockwell International Corporation
Rockwell International Corporation
Milwaukee, WI
Other trademarks owned by Rockwell International Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Miller
1201 S. 2nd St.Rockwell AutomationMilwaukee, WI 53204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE FIELD OF AVIATION INCLUDING AIRCRAFT CABIN SERVICE SYSTEMS, NAMELY, VIDEO MODULATORS, [ VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS, ] MEDIA FILE SERVERS, ETHERNET HUBS, PASSENGER ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM CONTROLLERS, PRIMARY ACCESS TERMINALS, CABIN FILE SERVERS, [ HIGH QUALITY PRINTERS, ] AREA DISTRIBUTION BOXES, AUDIO VIDEO UNITS, ENHANCED PASSENGER CONTROL UNITS, SEAT DISPLAY UNITS, VIDEO DISTRIBUTION CONTROLLERS; COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS NAMELY, RECEIVERS, AUDIO DISTRIBUTION UNITS, UHF, VHF AND HF TRANSCEIVERS, [ JAMMERS, POWER AMPLIFIERS, ] ANTENNA COUPLERS, RADIO/TELEPHONE INTERFACE UNITS, SATELLITE COMMUNICATION UNITS; DATA LINK COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY AUTO-PILOT SYSTEMS NAMELY AUTOPILOT FLIGHT DIRECTOR COMPUTERS; MODE CONTROL PANELS, SENSORS, SERVOS, GYROSCOPES [ , AND BACKDRIVE CONTROL ACTUATORS ] ; FLIGHT DISPLAY SYSTEMS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC FLIGHT DISPLAYS, HEADS UP DISPLAYS, ELECTRONICS HORIZONTAL SITUATION INDICATORS, RADIO MAGNETIC INDICATORS, DIGITAL INDICATORS; MISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS NAMELY CENTRAL MAINTENANCE COMPUTERS, [ FILE SERVERS, ] MULTIPURPOSE DISPLAYS AND CONTROLLERS; GEOPHYSICAL SENSORS- NAMELY, AIR DATA COMPUTERS, ATTITUDE HEADING SYSTEMS NAMELY MAGNETIC FLUX DETECTORS, INERTIAL SENSORS, COMPENSATORS, DISPLAYS AND ATTITUDE HEADING COMPUTERS; MAGNETIC COMPASS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, GYROSCOPES, MAGNETIC FLUX DETECTORS, REMOTE COMPENSATORS AND CONTROLLERS; HAZARD DETECTION SYSTEMS, NAMELY, WEATHER RADAR SYSTEMS, NAMELY WEATHER RADAR RECEIVERS, TRANSMITTERS, MOUNTING BRACKETS, CONTROL PANELS, ANTENNA, AND ANTENNA MOUNTS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS-NAMELY, AIRBORNE COMMUNICATIONS ADDRESSING AND REPORTING DEVICES; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS-NAMELY, ENGINE INDICATION AND CREW ALERTING DEVICES; NAVIGATION AND LANDING SYSTEMS-NAMELY, AUTOMATIC DIRECTION FINDERS, RADIO ALTIMETERS, DISTANCE MEASURING EQUIPMENT, GLOBAL POSITION SENSORS, NAVIGATION RECEIVERS, MULTI MODE RECEIVERS, VHF OMNI-DIRECTIONAL RANGE/MARKER BEACON RECEIVERS; RADIO CONTROLS-NAMELY, RADIO TUNING UNITS; TRAFFIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS- NAMELY, TRAFFIC ALERT AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS, ATC TRANSPONDERS; MODE S TRANSPONDERS | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwell International Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwell International Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ROCKWELL COLLINS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |