USPTO serial 76212043
RAPID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAPID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
7122 NZ Aalten, NL
7122 NZ Aalten, NL
7122 NZ Aalten, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Fire extinguishing compositions; flame decelerating compositions; chemical substances, namely, adhesive and water-repellent sealing chemical compounds, namely, ethylene, propylene, Diane all for use in the field of fire protection and fire prevention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Sealing cuffs and sealing sleeves of metal designed to adopt filling material for the prevention of fire, fluid, and gas along pipe and cable lines; metal pipe and cable channels; pipe muffs of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Sheaths for electric cables; insulating sheaths for electric cables; fire extinguishers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Sealing packings, sealing cuffs, and sealing muffs of fireproof material for the prevention of fire, fluid and gas along cable lines; pipe muffs not of metal designed to adopt filling material for the prevention of fire, fluid and gas along pipe and cable lines; adhesive and water-repellent sealing compounds, namely, monomer rubber, cyclonic-butadiene rubber, inlet rubber, ethyl copolymer rubber, heliotrope rubber and polyhedron rubber, all for use in the field of fire protection and fire prevention in construction and construction materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Refractory building materials, namely, non-metallic fireproof bricks, blocks, concrete and concrete building elements, non-metallic pipe and cable channels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of fire alarms; fire prevention and fire security alarm installation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education, training and courses in the fields of fire prevention, fire protection and fire-fighting operations; fireman education, namely, conducting seminars and conferences in the field of fireman education; distributing course materials in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultation services in the fields of fire prevention and protection; consultation services in the fields of fire prevention and protection with respect to architectural technical aspects; services of a fire emergency center, namely, execution of fire tests and reporting of the outcome thereof; repressive assistance in the field of fire-fighting, namely extinguishing fires | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RAPID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |