Drawing for TITAN TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 76212284

TITAN TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TITAN TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry L. Kelmachter

BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2809UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools, namely, power wrenchesACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorships featuring power tools, namely, power wrenches; on-line retail store services featuring power tools, namely, power wrenchesACTIVE—
042Technical consultation in the field of power tools, namely power wrenchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 23, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 8, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 7, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 5, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance