USPTO serial 76212382
EMD TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMD TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Electromed International Limitee
St-Eustache (Quebec) J7R 5V3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Marketing, design, development and manufacturing of medical generators, medical imagery systems and X-ray generators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |