USPTO serial 76213024
MPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Jordan, UT
South Jordan, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Krieger
MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWR 60 E S TEMPSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ENCODED ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO STORE AND TRANSMIT DEMOGRAPHIC AND OTHER INFORMATION, SUCH AS THE USER'S FINANCIAL INSTITUTION INFORMATION, SECURITY CODES, MEDICAL STATUS AND OTHER PERSONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE USER | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Processing manufacturer's coupons over a computer network using personal wireless devices; issuing gift certificates which may then be redeemed for goods and services over a computer network using personal wireless devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Electronic check processing and verification; electronic cash transactions; electronic credit card and debit card transactions; automated teller machine services; electronic toll collection services; electronic and wireless payment services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet and via wireless networks; credit card processing and verification, namely, point of sale credit and purchase approval services over a wireless network using personal wireless devices; and credit card services; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data over a computer network using personal wireless devices; electronic toll collection services done over a computer network using personal wireless devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | WIRELESS DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ln2M.com LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ln2M.com LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MPAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |