USPTO serial 76213062
VEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ramat-Gan 52515, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen B. Shankman
TALLY EITAN EITAN, PEARL, LATZER & COHEN ZEDEK LLP10 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 1001NEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial and monetary exchange services; financial clearing houses; financial forecasting; financial management services; financial investment in the field of securities; financial consulting and analysis; providing investment brokerage and financing services for highly leveraged transactions such as leveraged buy-outs and venture capital investments; providing financial information in the nature of funds performances and comparisons; financial planning services; financial services in the nature of investment banking services; securities brokerage and securities trading services for others; stock brokerage services; investment management and advice and research relating to all of the foregoing; providing home equity loans, installment loans, lease-purchase loans, temporary loans, and security services, namely, guaranteeing loans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |