USPTO serial 76213083
KILLER PACKAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KILLER PACKAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Plastic and paper bags for merchandise packaging, plastic bubble packs for wrapping and packaging, cardboard containers, corrugated containers, paper containers, paper for wrapping and packaging, cushioning or padding made of paper for packing purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastic film for industrial and commercial wrapping, packing padding of plastic and foam for shipping containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic containers and molded foam containers for the packaging, storage and transport of goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROACTIVE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named KILLER PACKAGING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |