USPTO serial 76213215
MIGHTY MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIGHTY MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H Brooke
JOHN H BROOKE BROOKE & CLOYD PC112 E GILBERT STMUNCIE, IN 47305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | consumer fireworks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |