USPTO serial 76214028
TORGET.SE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE RECEIVED AT REPOSITORY HOLDING AREA FOR FILING
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORGET.SE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING AND ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD ADVERTISING | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING WEBSITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS AND CONSULTATION IN CONNECTION THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |