USPTO serial 76214150
ZOOM CULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZOOM CULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A Jose Cortina
A JOSE CORTINA KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP3737 GLENWOOD AVE STE 400RALEIGH, NC 27612-5515UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing an interactive and audio visual, television program in the field of life entertainment via global computer network; distribution of audio visual and interactive television programs for others over the global computer network; educational services, namely, conducting tutorials in the field of media production and distributing course materials in the nature of compact discs in connection therewith via the global computer network | ABANDONED | Oct 6, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |