Drawing for INMARK

USPTO serial 76214314

INMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307668Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with INMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bret J. Danow

Bret J. Danow KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP50 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10020United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036[ Banking; investment brokerage, management, advice and consultation; ] insurance brokerage, administration and consultationACTIVENov 15, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 20, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 14, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 27, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 20, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 20, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 11, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 20148.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 9, 20148.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Apr 9, 2014ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 21, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 18, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 17, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance