USPTO serial 76214483
MORUCCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2664779Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MORUCCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75015 Paris, FR
75015 Paris, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical devices and instruments, namely, optical filters, eyeglass cleaning sprays and cloths; articles for the eyeglass trade, namely, eyeglass displays, eyeglass chains; eyeglass frames; corrective eyeglasses and sunglasses; optical lenses; eyeglass cases, contact lenses cases; and eyeglass lenses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |