USPTO serial 76214483
MORUCCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MORUCCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75015 Paris, FR
75015 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Meyer
JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical devices and instruments, namely, optical filters, eyeglass cleaning sprays and cloths; articles for the eyeglass trade, namely, eyeglass displays, eyeglass chains; eyeglass frames; corrective eyeglasses and sunglasses; optical lenses; eyeglass cases, contact lenses cases; and eyeglass lenses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |