USPTO serial 76215693
LSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF LIGHTS, NAMELY, FIBER OPTIC, COMMUNICATIONS LINES, ROADWAY LIGHTING, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SPORT FIELD LIGHTING, PARKING LOT LIGHTING, CONDUITS AND MANHOLES | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |