USPTO serial 76215860
FYBERSERV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2806981Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2004
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FYBERSERV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greensboro, NC
Greensboro, NC
Greensboro, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randel S. Springer
Randel S. Springer Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLCOne West Fourth StreetWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | customer service information and advice offered through the medium of a website and electronic database in the textiles industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |