Drawing for COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76216008

COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Garvey

JOHN C GARVEY STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS, IN THE FIELDS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION PROCESSING AND THE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, VIDEO, AUDIO AND DATA OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, WIRELINE NETWORKS OR WIRELESS NETWORKS, ELECTRONIC VOICE MESSAGING AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, FOR OTHERS, IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ON MARKETING VOICE MESSAGING AND RELATED INFORMATION PROCESSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE THEREFORE, AND SERVICES; ANALYSIS AND DIAGNOSIS OF VOICE MESSAGING SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance