USPTO serial 76216048
BRANDY DE JEREZ SOLERA VETERANO CASA FUNDADA EN 1772 LLE OSBORNE 36% VOL. EMB. NO. 197-CA R. EXP. 126
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRANDY DE JEREZ SOLERA VETERANO CASA FUNDADA EN 1772 LLE OSBORNE 36% VOL. EMB. NO. 197-CA R. EXP. 126?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
11500. Puerto de Santa Maria (Cadiz), ES
11500. Puerto de Santa Maria (Cadiz), ES
11.500 PUERTO DE SANTA MARIA (CADIZ), ES
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Osborne y Cia S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Osborne y Cia S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO OSBORNE, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRANDY DE JEREZ SOLERA VETERANO CASA FUNDADA EN 1772 LLE OSBORNE 36% VOL. EMB. NO. 197-CA R. EXP. 126
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |