USPTO serial 76216075
PUTTING FAMILIES FIRST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUTTING FAMILIES FIRST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides, all for domestic and agricultural use; insect and pest repellants; chemical preparations used to kill insects and external parasites for domestic use; preparations used for destroying vermin, pests and insects; and insect and pest repellants in the nature of shampoos, oils, candles, lotions, sprays and torches | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | insect and pest traps containing bait and lures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EcoSMART Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EcoSMART Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PUTTING FAMILIES FIRST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |