Drawing for THE INTERVENTIONAL HEART GROUP

USPTO serial 76216192

THE INTERVENTIONAL HEART GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE INTERVENTIONAL HEART GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Greenberg, Esq

MATTHEW J GREENBERG ESQ ROSENBERG CALICA & BIRNEY LLP100 GDN CITY PLZ STE 408GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Clinical, medical, and diagnostic heart related servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 31, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 1, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 1, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 11, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance