USPTO serial 76216380
PERFORMASTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEYER JR, BROOKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMASTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | finishing type coatings for use on industrial tooling, namely, cutting tools, medical tools, forming tools and dies | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | parts for power-operated industrial tools, namely, saws, drills and cutters, which parts are mounted on spindles of industrial, power machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | medical tools, namely, saws, drills and broaches | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | services of applying thin film coating to products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Star Cutter Company
- Other trademarks owned by Star Cutter Company
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PERFORMASTAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |