USPTO serial 76216669
AKETON TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AKETON TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | structural machine supports for use in connection with semiconductor wafer processing machines in manufacturing facilities, namely, pedestals and ledger plate tops | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | computer software for use in the field of design, construction, maintenance and improvement of manufacturing processes and facilities in the semiconductor, biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries; computer software for use in analyzing, projecting, and tracking utility requirements and utility usage in industrial facilities and manuals supplied therewith; life safety computer and related hardware, namely, computer hardware and software for the monitoring of building exits in emergency situations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKETON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AKETON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AKETON TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |