USPTO serial 76217502
SHARPOWL THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHARPOWL THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hertfordshire WD6 1JH, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SPREADSHEETS AND DATABASES PROVIDING FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, TIME RECORDING AND BILLING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, ACCOUNTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES; DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE UPGRADES FOR USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SPREADSHEETS AND DATABASES PROVIDING FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, TIME RECORDING AND BILLING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, ACCOUNTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES; PRERECORDED MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON COMPUTER DISCS, COMPACT DISCS AND CD-ROMS FEATURING BUSINESS SOFTWARE; ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; TIME RECORDING AND BILLING SOFTWARE; PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS AND BLANK RECORDING DISCS; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS RECORDED ON COMPUTER DISCS IN THE NATURE OF BROCHURES AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS SOFTWARE, ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, TIME RECORDING AND BILLING SOFTWARE, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |