Drawing for BORDER NEON

USPTO serial 76217719

BORDER NEON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BORDER NEON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel T. Beres

JOEL T BERES STITES & HARBISON400 W MARKET ST STE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3362UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC SIGNS, NAMELY, AN INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR COMMERCIAL BORDER OR TRIM DESIGNED USING WAVEGUIDES, HIGH INTENSITY LEDS AND ELONGATED LENSING TECHNIQUESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance