USPTO serial 76218190
PUMP GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUMP GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur G. Yeager
ARTHUR G YEAGER112 W ADAMS ST STE 1305JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202-3832UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | enclosures in the nature of fiberglass laminate material with and without insulation for environmental protection of above ground pumps and plumbing of water supply systems | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 20, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |