USPTO serial 76218439
SMARTHEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTHEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Boulder, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use with interactive digitized and/or synthesized audio communication systems for use in delivering and receiving audio messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Automated communications services, namely, facilitating communication between health care providers and patients and in processing data related thereto, via telephone, computer, facsimile, the Internet, electronic mail, short messaging service (SMS), and wireless application protocol (WAP) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTTALK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTTALK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SmartTalk.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SMARTHEALTH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |