USPTO serial 76218451
UNIBANCO ASSET MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIBANCO ASSET MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
UNIBANCO ASSET MANAGEMENT - BANCO DE INVESTIMENTO S/A
Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR
Other trademarks owned by UNIBANCO ASSET MANAGEMENT - BANCO DE INVESTIMENTO S/A
UAM ASSESSORIA E GESTAO DE INVESTIMENTOS LTDA.
SAO PAULO, BR
Other trademarks owned by UAM ASSESSORIA E GESTAO DE INVESTIMENTOS LTDA.
UAM ASSESSORIA E GESTAO DE INVESTIMENTOS LTDA.
SAO PAULO, BR
Other trademarks owned by UAM ASSESSORIA E GESTAO DE INVESTIMENTOS LTDA.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | (Based on 44(d) priority application) (Based on Intent to Use) investment advising, consultation, planning and management; securities and mutual fund investment; securities brokerage and commodities trading services; mutual fund distribution services; and securities analysis and recommendations; (Based on Intent to Use) financial services, namely, financial analysis, consultation, planning and management; maintenance and management of securities and equity holdings in other companies; stock exchange and commodity price quotations; and providing financial news and information via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIBANCO ASSET MANAGEMENT - BANCO DE INVESTIMENTO S/A
- Other trademarks owned by UAM ASSESSORIA E GESTAO DE INVESTIMENTOS LTDA.
- Other trademarks owned by UAM ASSESSORIA E GESTAO DE INVESTIMENTOS LTDA.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named UNIBANCO ASSET MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |