USPTO serial 76218853
DITTOLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DITTOLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Agoura Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH ARE BOTH UTILIZED FOR COMPUTER HARD DISK DRIVE PROTECTION, DUPLICATION AND RECOVERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |