USPTO serial 76219152
INTEGRA ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRA ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John G. Froemming
JOHN G FROEMMING BOX NO 34HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management and consulting services for others in The energy industry, namely arranging for the creation, construction, management, provision, acquisition, operation, and ownership of energy commodities supply, generation, transportation, transmission and distribution facilities and infrastrucure; purchasing services, namely, procurement for others in the field of energy commodities; billing services; tariff audit, analysis and optimization including negotiations in connection therewith; marketing energy products; operation of energy-related assets; operation of a business for others, namely, public utilities which broker, market and monitor use of power, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |