USPTO serial 76219755
C CELLEXPOWER THE NEW POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C CELLEXPOWER THE NEW POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, British Columbia V6V 2A2, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC FUEL CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |